Explicit Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Conservation Laws

The two explicit DG methods in this study are based on a ‘predictor-corrector’ formulation, the first introduced by Lörcher, Gassner, and Munz (2007, 2008) called space–time expansion discontinuous Galerkin or STE-DG scheme, and the second, introduced independently by the author (Huynh 2006, 2013) called the upwind moment scheme. The predictor step of the two methods is essentially identical using a Cauchy-Kovalevsky (CK) procedure, which involves no interaction of the data among neighboring cells. The corrector step also shares the same space-time integration formulation and is where interaction of the data among neighboring cells takes place; the difference, however, is in how the resulting space-time volume integral is estimated. As a consequence of the different estimates, for the case of advection in one spatial dimension (1D), the moment scheme has a CFL (Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy) condition of 1 for all p and is accurate to order 2p+1, i.e., it possesses the super accuracy property, whereas the STE-DG method has a more restrictive CFL condition and is accurate to the expected order of p+1. For 1D advection, compared with the CFL conditions of 1/(2p+1) of standard RK-DG (Runge-Kutta) scheme where space and time discretization are of the same order, the moment scheme allows a significantly larger time step size. It also turns out that the scheme yields a result identical to Van Leer’s scheme III (1977), which amounts to shifting the data a distance of advection corresponding to the time step and projecting the result onto the space of polynomial solutions. Contrary to Van Leer’s approach, however, the space-time ‘predictor-corrector’ formulation facilitates extensions to the case of systems of equations. Concerning 2D extensions, in the case of advection, when the flow is along the diagonal direction, the CFL conditions for the moment schemes become restrictive as will be shown by Fourier (Von Neumann) stability and accuracy analyses. Since the moment scheme employs the right Radau points as collocation points in time, the method is closely related to the implicit Radau IIA scheme, which is stable for any time step size. The role of Radau IIA in relieving stability restriction for these explicit DG schemes remains to be explored