Comparing Commercial and Research Computational Fluid Dynamic Codes Using High-Order Workshop Benchmark Problems

The commercial computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code ANSYS Fluent and multiple research CFD codes (ez4d with uses the conservation element and solution element (CESE) method and codes that use the flux reconstruction (FR) method) were tested using three different benchmark problems from the International Workshop for High-Order CFD Methods. The benchmark problems included the transonic Ringleb flow, vortex transport by uniform flow, and laminar boundary layer on a flat plate. Simulation results from all three benchmark problems showed that the Fluent solutions had less error than the ez4d solutions for a given degree of freedom. As expected, both the Fluent and ez4d solutions had larger errors for a given degree of freedom than the simulations that used the FR method because both Fluent and ez4d utilized a second-order scheme whereas the FR codes utilized a fourth-order scheme.