Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction

This final report documents work performed by ATA Engineering, Inc., (ATA) to develop computational models and analyze the coupled fluid-structure response of two types of noise treatments applied to the leading-edge-slat component of a high-lift system typical of modern transport aircraft. The first treatment is a slat-gap filler (SGF), which closes the gap between the suction surfaces of a deployed slat and an aircraft main wing, and the second treatment is a slat-cove filler (SCF), which replaces the recirculating flow on the slat cove with a surface that promotes flow attachment.

The representative airframe chosen for this work was NASA’s High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) in a baseline high-lift configuration. Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been identified as enabling materials for these structural treatments. Since the technology elements rely upon having a highly reconfigurable structure, designs were assessed for their static aeroelastic deflection as well as their dynamic aeroelastic stability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear computational structural dynamics (NL-CSD) tools. Specifically, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems were solved computationally using the CFD solver Loci/CHEM and the NL-CSD solver Abaqus. As a part of the overall project, a similar capability was implemented using the CFD solver FUN3D coupled to Abaqus, although that work is documented in a separate report and that FSI framework was not used to analyze any of NASA’s SGF and SCF configurations.

The technical approach consisted of solving for the flow field around the entire vehicle using a global CFD model, followed by extraction of relevant local subdomain data for CFD and NL-CSD co-simulations. The SGF design was analyzed using both 2D and 3D co-simulations to predict quasi-static aeroelastic deformations and to assess dynamic aeroelastic stability, whereas the SCF was analyzed in 2D only.

SGF static aeroelastic response predictions focused on characterizing the deformed shape, with maximum displacements predicted to be on the order of magnitude of the technology element panel thickness. SGF dynamic aeroelastic response predictions used Partial Floquet analysis of the temporal evolution of selected nodal displacements to quantify the sign and magnitude of aeroelastic damping. Results suggest that the CRM-HL operating conditions would result in a dynamically stable response. The simulated dynamic pressure was also increased up to a factor of about four, and resulting responses suggest that predicted dynamic stability would be achieved with some margin.