Analysis of Integrated Spacecraft Performance Using A Rotating Detonation Rocket EngineFor spacecraft with especially stringent mass fraction constraints, the use of a rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE) may yield potentially significant system mass savings. The pressure gain combustion inherent to RDREs provides higher thrust than traditional rocket engines for a given supply pressure and throat area. This opens multiple avenues for reducing system mass via higher specific impulse, reduced gravity losses, and reduced feed pressures.
To highlight the potentially weight-saving characteristics of RDRE systems, the integrated performance of representative spacecraft designs using either a conventional rocket engine or an RDRE was assessed. This paper details the assumptions, methods, and results of this trade study. Two representative spacecraft were assessed. The first is a Liquid Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This spacecraft was designed by NASA in 2011 for the Mars Sample Return Campaign but was not selected for flight due in part to it exceeding the mass requirements by 119 lbm. The second is MIURA-1, a kerolox sounding rocket developed by Payload Aerospace S.L..
The Liquid MAV assessment showed that an RDRE powered design met the mass requirements with a total vehicle mass 46 lbm below the limit. The MIURA-1 assessment showed that wall heat transfer and regenerative cooling are significant challenges for kerolox RDREs, but these challenges may be mitigated by reducing mixture ratio and using both propellants to cool the chamber. The assessment showed that an RDRE powered sounding rocket could achieve 12% more microgravity time than a conventional sounding rocket with the same payload and total vehicle mass. Alternately, if the payload mass and target apogee are held constant, then an RDRE powered sounding rocket can be 8% shorter and 11% lighter than a conventional sounding rocket. These results suggest that the advent of RDREs for in-space propulsion may unlock new missions for which conventional propulsion is not feasible.
Document ID
20240003814
Acquisition Source
Glenn Research Center
Document Type
Conference Paper
Authors
M.J. Cooper (Glenn Research Center Cleveland, United States)
D.E. Paxson (Glenn Research Center Cleveland, United States)
H.D. Perkins (Glenn Research Center Cleveland, United States)
J.E. Fittje (Science Applications International Corporation (United States) McLean, Virginia, United States)
Date Acquired
April 1, 2024
Subject Category
Engineering (General)Spacecraft Design, Testing and Performance
Meeting Information
Meeting: Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force (JANNAF) Subcommittee Meeting