Alternate Methods of Model Reduction to Avoid Dynamic Modal Truncation Error

Loads analysis is traditionally performed using dynamically reduced models, which provides the benefit to reduce run time. If the reduced model frequency cutoff is not chosen appropriately, the model will lack the dynamic content required to fully represent the response of the non-reduced model. Standard guidance for reduced model frequency content, provided in NASA-STD-5002, is to solve fixed base modes up to a minimum of 1.5x the model frequency content of interest and to employ static modal truncation methods such as residual vectors, the mode acceleration method, and the residual flexibility method to account for the truncated flexibility of the missing modes. Fixed base modes require the selection of a set of degrees of freedom to be constrained which, if not properly selected, may affect the accuracy of the reduced model by excluding some of the dynamic characteristic of the full model. In this case, the standard NASA guidance would be insufficient, but it may not be readily apparent that a portion of the reduced model response is missing. This error was encountered during an independent verification and validation (IV&V) effort, where it was observed that the resulting dynamic response was lower than the inline analysis. In this specific case, despite following the standard NASA model reduction guidelines in the selection of the frequency cutoff, the inline model still did not fully capture the necessary dynamic content.

As part of the IV&V, an alternate reduction methodology was employed using an unconstrained mode acceleration method. The original model initially performed a constrained reduction to twice the frequency content of interest before doing a free-free run, employing the mode acceleration method to account for the truncated modes. In contrast in the IV&V, the unconstrained model reduced directly to the needed frequency content of the free-free run, avoiding any interactions between constraints and dynamic content.

To verify the model, the original reduction methodology was used to generate a series of Hurty-Craig-Bampton reductions, each with a higher frequency cutoff than the previous. The results were shown to converge once the frequency cutoff increased past eight times the frequency content of interest. At the same frequency cutoff, the results of the Hurty-Craig-Bampton model converged with the results of the unconstrained mode acceleration model. This comparative study provided confidence that the results of the unconstrained modal acceleration reduced model were correct and that the Hurty-Craig-Bampton needed to increase its frequency cutoff to fully capture the dynamic response.