NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Large Impact Features on Ganymede and Callisto as Revealed By Geological Mapping and MorphometryThe icy Galilean satellites are host to a broad range of impact feature morphologies. Hypotheses seeking to explain the diversity of these impact features consider the effects of impact melt, the physical state of the subsurface at the time of impact, and the impactor characteristics. As part of a larger effort to assess the role of these factors in the formation and evolution of these impact features, we have performed topographic and geological mapping of 19 large impact features on Ganymede and Callisto. These are divided into two main morphological groups: craters (subdivided into pit, dome, and anomalous dome craters), and penepalimpsests/palimpsests. The transitions from pit, dome, to anomalous dome craters appear to be size-dependent up to diameters of ∼170 km. The morphologies of pit and dome craters appear to be independent of their age or geologic context. The impacts that formed them only affected a cold, rigid ice layer, with the development of pits and raised annuli on their floors possibly stemming from the evolution of a pocket of impact melt. The subdued rims and floors of anomalous dome craters indicate the increasing effect of a weak, warm ice layer on impact feature morphology with increasing size, but their prominent annuli and pits indicate that mobilization of impact melt is also a factor. The very low topographic relief of older penepalimpsests and palimpsests indicates that their impacts penetrated the ice shell to mobilize very large volumes of pre-existing liquid from a subsurface layer, with little contribution to the final feature morphology from impact melt. Penepalimpsests are distinguished from palimpsests by the higher frequency of concentric ridges within their interiors, indicating a generally more robust state of the subsurface that could better support the rotation and uplift of solid material during impact, even if a crater-like depression could not be supported. A few impact features seem to be transitional between anomalous dome craters and penepalimpsests, and the overlap of anomalous dome craters, penepalimpsests, and palimpsests in terms of diameter as well as age indicates that impactor size and subsurface properties over time are major factors in determining which of these morphologies emerges.
Document ID
20240015919
Acquisition Source
Ames Research Center
Document Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Authors
Oliver L White
(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Mountain View, United States)
Jeffrey M Moore
(Ames Research Center Mountain View, United States)
Paul M Schenk
(Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas, United States)
Donald G Korycansky
(University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, United States)
Andrew J Dombard
(University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, United States)
Martina L Caussi
(University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, United States)
Kelsi N Singer
(Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, United States)
Date Acquired
December 11, 2024
Publication Date
January 15, 2025
Publication Information
Publication: Icarus
Publisher: Elsevier
Volume: 426
Issue Publication Date: January 15, 2025
ISSN: 0019-1035
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103524004172
Subject Category
Geosciences (General)
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 80NSSC19K0551
WBS: 811073.02.37.03.05
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
Single Expert
No Preview Available