NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Due to the lapse in federal government funding, NASA is not updating this website. We sincerely regret this inconvenience.

Back to Results
Volcanic plume height during the 2021 Tajogaite Eruption (La Palma) measured by two complementary monitoring methodologies: Implications for satellite-based SO2 mass emission estimatesVolcanic emissions from the Tajogaite volcano, located on the Cumbre Vieja edifice on the island of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain), caused significant public health and aviation disruptions throughout the volcanic event (19 September – 13 December 2021, officially declared over on 25 December). The Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN), the authority responsible for volcano surveillance in Spain, implemented extensive scientific monitoring to track volcanic activity and to provide a robust estimation of the volcanic plume height using a video-surveillance network. In parallel, the State Meteorological Agency of Spain (AEMET), in collaboration with other members of ACTRIS (Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure) in Spain, in collaboration with other institutions, carried out an unprecedented instrumental deployment to assess the atmospheric composition impacts of this rare event. This effort included a network of aerosol profilers surrounding the volcano. A total of four profiling instruments were installed on La Palma: one MPL-4B lidar and three ceilometers. Additionally, a pre-existing Raman lidar on the island contributed valuable data to this study.

In this study, the eruptive process was characterised in terms of the altitude of the dispersive volcanic plume (hd), measured by both IGN and AEMET-ACTRIS, and the altitude of the eruptive column (hec), measured by IGN. Modulating factors such as seismicity and meteorological conditions were also analysed. The results confirmed the existence of three distinct eruptive phases, encompassing a range of styles from Strombolian explosive to effusive activity.

The consistency between the two independent and complementary datasets (hd,IGN and hd,AEM ET) was assessed throughout the eruption (mean difference of 258.6 m). Furthermore, a comparison of hd,AEM ET with the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aerosol layer height product (ALHCALIOP) revealed a systematic underestimation by the satellite product, with a mean difference of 615.0 m (392.2 m if 6 October is excluded from the analysis).

Finally, the impact of using hec in estimating SO2 emissions from the NASA MSV OLSO2L4 satellite-based product was evaluated. When a fixed plume altitude of 8 km was used instead of the observed hec, the total SO2 mass was significantly underestimated by an average of 56.2%, and by up to 84.7% in some cases. These findings underscore the importance of accurately determining the volcanic plume height when deriving SO2 emissions from satellite data.
Document ID
20250006849
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Authors
Agrica Barreto
(Agencia Estatal de Meteorología Madrid, Spain)
Francisco Quiros
(Instituto Geográfico Nacional Madrid, Spain)
Omaira E. Garcia
(Agencia Estatal de Meteorología Madrid, Spain)
Jorge Pereda-de-Pablo
(Instituto Geográfico Nacional Madrid, Spain)
Daniel Gonzalez
(Universidad de Valladolid Valladolid, Spain)
Andres Bedoya-Velazquez
(Université de Toulouse Toulouse, France)
Michael Sicard
(Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain)
Carmen Córdoba ORCID
(Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial Madrid, Spain)
Marco Iarlori
(University of L'Aquila L’Aquila, Italy)
Vincenzo Rizi
(University of L'Aquila L’Aquila, Italy)
Nickolay Krotkov
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Simon Carn
(Michigan Technological University Houghton, Michigan, United States)
Reijo Roininen
(Vaisala (Finland) Vantaa, Finland)
Antonio J. Molina-Arias
(Instituto Geográfico Nacional Madrid, Spain)
Antonio Fernando Almansa
(Cimel Electronique)
Óscar Álvarez-Losada
(TRAGSATEC Madrid, Spain)
Carla Aramo
(Complesso Universitario Monte Sant’Angelo)
Juan José Bustos
(Agencia Estatal de Meteorología Madrid, Spain)
Can Li
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Clara V. Carvajal-Pérez
(Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial Madrid, Spain)
Romain Ceolato
(Université de Toulouse Toulouse, France)
Adolfo Comerón
(Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain)
Alicia Felpeto
(Instituto Geográfico Nacional Madrid, Spain)
Rosa D. García
(TRAGSATEC Madrid, Spain)
Pablo González-Sicilia
(TRAGSATEC Madrid, Spain)
Yenny González
(Cimel Electronique)
Pascal Hedelt
(Remote Sensing Technology Institute Atmospheric Processors)
Miguel Hernández
(Agencia Estatal de Meteorología Madrid, Spain)
María-Ángeles López-Cayuela
(Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial Madrid, Spain)
Diego Loyola
(German Aerospace Center Cologne, Germany)
Stavros Meletlidis
(Instituto Geográfico Nacional Madrid, Spain)
Constantino Muñoz-Porcar
(Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain)
Ermanno Pietropaolo
(University of L'Aquila L’Aquila, Italy)
Ramón Ramos
(International Arctic Research Center)
Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez
(Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain)
Roberto Román
(Universidad de Valladolid Valladolid, Spain)
Pedro M. Romero-Campos
(Agencia Estatal de Meteorología Madrid, Spain)
Martin Stuefer
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Carlos Toledano
(Universidad de Valladolid Valladolid, Spain)
Ellsworth Welton
(Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, United States)
Date Acquired
July 8, 2025
Publication Date
October 15, 2025
Publication Information
Publication: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
ISSN: 1867-1381
e-ISSN: 1867-8548
Subject Category
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
Funding Number(s)
WBS: 281945.02.20.03.59
WBS: 509496.02.03.01.17.24
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
No Preview Available