NASA Logo

NTRS

NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server

Back to Results
Arctic Warming in Response to Regional Aerosol Emissions ReductionsThis study examines the Arctic surface air temperature response to regional aerosol emissions reductions using three fully coupled chemistry–climate models: National Center for Atmospheric Research-Community Earth System Model version 1, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory-Coupled Climate Model version 3 (GFDL-CM3) and Goddard Institute for Space Studies-ModelE version 2. Each of these models was used to perform a series of aerosol perturbation experiments, in which emissions of different aerosol types (sulfate, black carbon (BC), and organic carbon) in different northern mid-latitude source regions, and of biomass burning aerosol over South America and Africa, were substantially reduced or eliminated. We find that the Arctic warms in nearly every experiment, the only exceptions being the U.S. and Europe BC experiments in GFDL-CM3 in which there is a weak and insignificant cooling. The Arctic warming is generally larger than the global mean warming (i.e. Arctic amplification occurs), particularly during non-summer months. The models agree that changes in the poleward atmospheric moisture transport are the most important factor explaining the spread in Arctic warming across experiments: the largest warming tends to coincide with the largest increases in moisture transport into the Arctic. In contrast, there is an inconsistent relationship (correlation) across experiments between the local radiative forcing over the Arctic and the simulated Arctic warming, with this relationship being positive in one model (GFDL-CM3) and negative in the other two. Our results thus highlight the prominent role of poleward energy transport in driving Arctic warming and amplification, and suggest that the relative importance of poleward energy transport and local forcing/feedbacks is likely to be model dependent.
Document ID
20230010406
Acquisition Source
Goddard Space Flight Center
Document Type
Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Authors
Michael Previdi ORCID
(Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Sparkill, New York, United States)
Jean-François Lamarque ORCID
(National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, United States)
Arlene M Fiore ORCID
(Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Sparkill, New York, United States)
Daniel M Westervelt ORCID
(Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Sparkill, New York, United States)
Drew T Shindell ORCID
(Duke University Durham, North Carolina, United States)
Gustavo Correa ORCID
(Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Sparkill, New York, United States)
Gregory Faluvegi ORCID
(Columbia University New York, New York, United States)
Date Acquired
July 14, 2023
Publication Date
July 14, 2023
Publication Information
Publication: Environmental Research: Climate
Publisher: IOP Publishing
Volume: 2
Issue: 3
Issue Publication Date: September 1, 2023
e-ISSN: 2752-5295
Subject Category
Meteorology and Climatology
Funding Number(s)
CONTRACT_GRANT: 80NSSC20M0282
Distribution Limits
Public
Copyright
Portions of document may include copyright protected material.
Technical Review
External Peer Committee
Keywords
Arctic
aerosols
aerosol emissions
surface air temperature response
coupled chemistry–climate models
sulfate
black carbon
organic carbon
National Center for Atmospheric Research-Community Earth System Model version 1
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory-Coupled Climate Model version 3
GISS ModelE version 2
Arctic warming
poleward atmospheric moisture transport
Arctic climate change
Arctic amplification
radiative forcing
climate feedbacks
energy transport
No Preview Available